The Supreme Court also fiercely censured Patanjali and co-founders Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balakrishna for repeatedly violating its orders and filing improper affidavits.
New Delhi:
A furious Supreme Court on Wednesday ripped into the Uttarakhand government’s drug licencing authority, demanding to know why and how it failed to act against misleading ads floated by Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurved, specifically for Coronil – a preparation touted as a “cure” for COVID-19.
A bench of Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah – upset by what it sees as insincere apologies from the company and its founders – zeroed in on Dr Mithilesh Kumar, the Joint Director of the state’s Food and Drug Administration, who at one point begged, with folded hands, for mercy.
“Please spare me…” Dr Kumar said to the court, “I came in June 2023… this happened before me.”
The court, however, would not relent.
“Why should we? How did you have the guts to do this? What action did you take?” Justice Kohli asked. “One man seeks mercy (but) what about innocent people who took these medicines?”
The court – which minutes earlier also fiercely censured Patanjali and co-founders Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balakrishna, for repeatedly violating its orders and filing improper affidavits – showed little sympathy for the official or the drug licensing authority, and directed that three officers be suspended.
“Now their (drug officials) backs are to the wall… they say ‘we are issuing warning’,” the court raged, dismissing arguments the Uttarakhand FDA had acted – by handing Patanjali a mere slap on the wrist.
“In 2021 the (Union Health) Ministry wrote to the Uttarakhand licensing authority against a misleading advertisement. However, the authority let off the company with a warning. The 1954 act does not provide for warning and there is no provision for compounding the offence,” the court said.
The law in question is the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act.
“This happened six times… back and forth. The licensing inspector remained quiet. There is no report by the officer (in charge)… person appointed subsequently acted the same,” the Supreme Court said.
Refocusing its ire on Dr Kumar, the court asked him why he failed to take legal advice when presented with the Health Ministry’s notice. “Did you read the law? Do you think a warning was enough? What is the provision in this law? What case did you file? What steps did you take?”
“We will register (now)…” the beleaguered officer said.
“No… now you just sit at home for a few days. Or you can sit in office and write letters. You are playing with the public’s health!” the court responded curtly.
Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter & Pinterest and Instagram and Keep
visiting us for Latest News Online.
CREDIT: – NDTV
